Democracy (Greek: δημοκρατία dēmokratía, literally "Rule by 'People'") - value criterion
Democracy (Greek: δημοκρατία dēmokratía, literally "Rule by 'People'") is a system of government where the citizens exercise power by voting. In a direct democracy, the citizens as a whole form a governing body and vote directly on each issue. In a representative democracy the citizens elect representatives from among themselves. These representatives meet to form a governing body, such as a legislature. In a constitutional democracy the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of a representative democracy, but the constitution limits the majority and protects the minority, usually through the enjoyment by all of certain individual rights, e.g. freedom of speech, or freedom of association.[1][2]
"Rule of the majority" is commonly referred to as democracy.[3] John Locke wrote: “There is no practical alternative to majority political rule – i.e., to taking the consent of the majority as the act of the whole and binding every individual. It would be next to impossible to obtain the consent of every individual before acting collectively … No rational people could desire and constitute a society that had to dissolve straightaway because the majority was unable to make the final decision and the society was incapable of acting as one body."[4]
Democracy is a system of processing conflicts in which outcomes depend on what participants do, but no single force controls what occurs and its outcomes. The uncertainty of outcomes is inherent in democracy. Democracy makes all forces struggle repeatedly to realize their interests and devolves power from groups of people to sets of rules.[5] Western democracy, as distinct from that which existed in pre-modern societies, is generally considered to have originated in city-states such as Classical Athens and the Roman Republic, where various schemes and degrees of enfranchisement of the free male population were observed before the form disappeared in the West at the beginning of late antiquity. The English word dates back to the 16th century, from the older Middle French and Middle Latin equivalents.
According to American political scientist Larry Diamond, democracy consists of four key elements: a political system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; the active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; protection of the human rights of all citizens; a rule of law, in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens.[6] Todd Landman, nevertheless, draws our attention to the fact that democracy and human rights are two different concepts and that "there must be greater specificity in the conceptualisation and operationalization of democracy and human rights".[7]
The term appeared in the 5th century BC to denote the political systems then existing in Greek city-states, notably Athens, to mean "rule of the people", in contrast to aristocracy (ἀριστοκρατία, aristokratía), meaning "rule of an elite". While theoretically these definitions are in opposition, in practice the distinction has been blurred historically.[8] The political system of Classical Athens, for example, granted democratic citizenship to free men and excluded slaves and women from political participation. In virtually all democratic governments throughout ancient and modern history, democratic citizenship consisted of an elite class, until full enfranchisement was won for all adult citizens in most modern democracies through the suffrage movements of the 19th and 20th centuries.
Democracy contrasts with forms of government where power is either held by an individual, as in an absolute monarchy, or where power is held by a small number of individuals, as in an oligarchy. Nevertheless, these oppositions, inherited from Greek philosophy,[9] are now ambiguous because contemporary governments have mixed democratic, oligarchic and monarchic elements. Karl Popper defined democracy in contrast to dictatorship or tyranny, thus focusing on opportunities for the people to control their leaders and to oust them without the need for a revolution.[10]
단원 정리
"Rule by 'People'"의 의미는, 다만, 政治的, 權力的 意味로서의 것만은 아닐 것이었다.
민주화 투사라고 말하였다. 그러나 民主化 鬪士라는 槪念 自體가 歪曲되었다.
우리가 民主主義를 論할 때, 보아야 하는 것들은, 비단 政治, 經濟, 社會, 文化 및 所得再分配 문제만은 아닐 것이었다.
그러나 그들이, 다만 정치적, 권력적, 탄압적, 노예적인 문제에 민주주의를 국한시키고 의도적으로 제한 하였으며, 그런 것이 民主主義인 것으로 착각하게 만들었다.
그러므로 우리는 이제부터 이 문제에 대해서 같이 공부해야 되었다.
우리가 보건대 가장 重要한 核心的 要素는, "平等的 人格權"의 保障이었지만, 그들은 이를 의도적으로 無視, 默殺했으며, 民主主義와는 어울리지 아니하는 "資本主義"와 "엘리트주의" 그리고 "帝國主義"를 竝行하는 矛盾과 自家撞着的 認識들을 보여주고 있었다.
"Rule of the majority" is commonly referred to as democracy.[3] John Locke wrote: “There is no practical alternative to majority political rule – i.e., to taking the consent of the majority as the act of the whole and binding every individual. It would be next to impossible to obtain the consent of every individual before acting collectively … No rational people could desire and constitute a society that had to dissolve straightaway because the majority was unable to make the final decision and the society was incapable of acting as one body."[4]
Democracy is a system of processing conflicts in which outcomes depend on what participants do, but no single force controls what occurs and its outcomes. The uncertainty of outcomes is inherent in democracy. Democracy makes all forces struggle repeatedly to realize their interests and devolves power from groups of people to sets of rules.[5] Western democracy, as distinct from that which existed in pre-modern societies, is generally considered to have originated in city-states such as Classical Athens and the Roman Republic, where various schemes and degrees of enfranchisement of the free male population were observed before the form disappeared in the West at the beginning of late antiquity. The English word dates back to the 16th century, from the older Middle French and Middle Latin equivalents.
According to American political scientist Larry Diamond, democracy consists of four key elements: a political system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; the active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; protection of the human rights of all citizens; a rule of law, in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens.[6] Todd Landman, nevertheless, draws our attention to the fact that democracy and human rights are two different concepts and that "there must be greater specificity in the conceptualisation and operationalization of democracy and human rights".[7]
The term appeared in the 5th century BC to denote the political systems then existing in Greek city-states, notably Athens, to mean "rule of the people", in contrast to aristocracy (ἀριστοκρατία, aristokratía), meaning "rule of an elite". While theoretically these definitions are in opposition, in practice the distinction has been blurred historically.[8] The political system of Classical Athens, for example, granted democratic citizenship to free men and excluded slaves and women from political participation. In virtually all democratic governments throughout ancient and modern history, democratic citizenship consisted of an elite class, until full enfranchisement was won for all adult citizens in most modern democracies through the suffrage movements of the 19th and 20th centuries.
Democracy contrasts with forms of government where power is either held by an individual, as in an absolute monarchy, or where power is held by a small number of individuals, as in an oligarchy. Nevertheless, these oppositions, inherited from Greek philosophy,[9] are now ambiguous because contemporary governments have mixed democratic, oligarchic and monarchic elements. Karl Popper defined democracy in contrast to dictatorship or tyranny, thus focusing on opportunities for the people to control their leaders and to oust them without the need for a revolution.[10]
단원 정리
"Rule by 'People'"의 의미는, 다만, 政治的, 權力的 意味로서의 것만은 아닐 것이었다.
민주화 투사라고 말하였다. 그러나 民主化 鬪士라는 槪念 自體가 歪曲되었다.
우리가 民主主義를 論할 때, 보아야 하는 것들은, 비단 政治, 經濟, 社會, 文化 및 所得再分配 문제만은 아닐 것이었다.
그러나 그들이, 다만 정치적, 권력적, 탄압적, 노예적인 문제에 민주주의를 국한시키고 의도적으로 제한 하였으며, 그런 것이 民主主義인 것으로 착각하게 만들었다.
그러므로 우리는 이제부터 이 문제에 대해서 같이 공부해야 되었다.
우리가 보건대 가장 重要한 核心的 要素는, "平等的 人格權"의 保障이었지만, 그들은 이를 의도적으로 無視, 默殺했으며, 民主主義와는 어울리지 아니하는 "資本主義"와 "엘리트주의" 그리고 "帝國主義"를 竝行하는 矛盾과 自家撞着的 認識들을 보여주고 있었다.
댓글
댓글 쓰기